how to get the correct sorting of work items by SLA status?
Hi folks
My boss wants to sort all active work items by the SLA Status.
The problem is that it groups the SLO Infos first by breached, warnings and nornmal, like:
for me, it would make a lot more sense, to have the already breached SLAs (red bell) on the very top, then the warnings and then the normal ones...
Is that possible?
Thanks and best regards
Best Answers
-
Konstantin_Slavin-Bo Customer Ninja IT Monkey ✭✭✭✭@Peter_Settle
Ah okay; yes, I understand what you were trying to do, but I'm afraid you're missing my point. To be clear: Your view is not the same as the screen shot I posted, please see the images to below:
My view:
Your view:
As you can see, your view (by being build in the criteria builder) ORs the two Status criteria, which gives the result I explained in my previous post. The only way to change that is in the XML. Again, it is not necessary to actually export and import the MP, as long as you have the Cireson View Builder, as that does have a build-in XML editor. If you do not a license for Cireson's View Builder, the free Advanced View Builder from FreemanRU / Anton Gritsenko has the same XML edit functionality: https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Advanced-View-Editor-20-377353f5
It does not have anything to do with how your "system is set up", as the difference between the two views will be the same everywhere. SCSM interprets XML the same way everywhere.
5
Answers
This is how we deal with it.
Just bear in mind that when you collapse the sections they will expand again when you reload the page.
As a simple example, defining and applying a custom compare function could also allow for one to define that some status should always sort above another, even though they do not sort that way alphabetically, which could help to ensure that analysts see those incidents first.
Many many thanks for your fast and helfpul answers!
@Peter_Settle: This mentioned views sound interesting:
How did you achieve that?
Are that saved searches?
Thank you so much!
Views are then linked to specific AD Groups to tie them down to specific teams
@Peter_Settle: Many thanks, that pretty much solved my problem!
The only remaining problem is, that the "service requests with service level breached"-view includes also all the closed tickets, which makes no sense at all.
Unfortunately it is not possible to duplicate this "service requests with service level breached"-view and Change any criteria settings, because everything is still greyed out:
Does anybody know why everything is greyed out?
thanks and best regards
Silas
It's because the criteria for the view is defined in XML, which can be setup in ways the criteria builder cannot handle, so it disables the criteria builder.
Do you have the CIreson View Builder? In that you can switch to the XML editor, and make the changes you need.
You can also export the MP you copied the view to and edit the XML directly in the MP and then import it again.
Sorry but our system contains a view "All Service Requests" which I can copy as its created using the criteria builder and not XML. Perhaps our systems are different in some way.
Please note, that when doing it that way, the view will show both SRs with status Cancelled and status Closed, as it OR's the two criteria together. I.e. if a SR is Closed, it will fulfill the "does not equal Cancelled" criteria, and therefore be shown. The same for the other way around.
Konstantin_Slavin-Bo Yes I totally agree , however I was just replicating your view in order to confirm that it could be done on our system without touching a MP.
Silas_Sulser it will depend on how your system is set as to whether you need to start exporting , editing and importing the MP. We do not appear to have many views that have been created using the XML Editor.
Ah okay; yes, I understand what you were trying to do, but I'm afraid you're missing my point. To be clear: Your view is not the same as the screen shot I posted, please see the images to below:
My view:
Your view:
As you can see, your view (by being build in the criteria builder) ORs the two Status criteria, which gives the result I explained in my previous post. The only way to change that is in the XML. Again, it is not necessary to actually export and import the MP, as long as you have the Cireson View Builder, as that does have a build-in XML editor. If you do not a license for Cireson's View Builder, the free Advanced View Builder from FreemanRU / Anton Gritsenko has the same XML edit functionality: https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Advanced-View-Editor-20-377353f5
It does not have anything to do with how your "system is set up", as the difference between the two views will be the same everywhere. SCSM interprets XML the same way everywhere.