To extend a portal WI form, does the console form have to be extended?
My relationship is not binding to the form in the portal on creation but will bind if re-saved. Following the answer of that thread, I opened and saved all templates and then did cmd iisreset and app pool recycle on my portal web server and it is still not binding on creation. Do I need to extend the console form to accommodate this new relationship before it will work in the portal?
Attached is the unsealed version of my MP for my WI extension and TP.
Best Answer
-
Joe_Burrows Cireson Devops Super IT Monkey ✭✭✭✭✭Agree with Geoff, create a new template and test.
If it works then extract the management pack that contains your existing change templates and check the projection ID (usually its the original ID and you can update to the new one and re-import)5
Answers
Have you checked out the following KB article:
https://support.cireson.com/KnowledgeBase/View/1174#/
Looks like you've done most of the steps, but now you need to assign that new TP to your form in the section for assigning forms to AD groups.
Geoff
Yes, that article was very helpful and I have already mapped the new type projection to the custom form.
The issue I'm having where the new relationship is not binding on new WI creation, but does work when filled out and re-saved, has been happening despite the TP being configured to the ad group in portal admin settings.
Secondly, as a test, can you try creating a new incident template, then create Incident from Template picking that new one and see if that works. If it does, then its the existing templates that are not picking up the new type projection. This could be SCSM or the portal so will need investigation if confirmed.
Geoff
If it works then extract the management pack that contains your existing change templates and check the projection ID (usually its the original ID and you can update to the new one and re-import)
This leads me to a question: How do I create a template so that it allows me to use a particular TP over another without having to hand author the MP?